I would need to know more facts to make a determination of the legality of the lawyers actions. Generally, rule 4.5 of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct prohibits lawyers from threatening to bring criminal, administrative, or disciplinary charges solely to gain an advantage in a civil matter. It allows lawyers, however, to inform others of potential violations if they reasonably believe the conduct is illegal. The rule aims to prevent misuse of legal processes for coercion in civil disputes, thereby maintaining public confidence in the legal system.
Also, under the FDCPA, once you have disputed a debt in writing, the debt collector, including a lawyer acting as a debt collector, must cease collection efforts until they provide verification of the debt. Continued calls and threats, such as suspending your license, are prohibited and considered harassment. Similarly, Colorado’s equivalent law, the Colorado Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (CFDCPA), reinforces these protections. If the lawyer continues to contact you or threaten you after you’ve disputed the debt, they may be violating both the FDCPA and CFDCPA.
Note again, however, that we need more facts. If the lawyer is collection a first party debt, for example, the FDCPA and the CFDCPA may not apply.
Because you may have legal recourse, I would recommend speaking to an attorney. At R&H, Partner Joe Lico has a lot of experience representing debtors in FDCPA and CFDCPA actions. If you would like a consultation, please ask for him specifically. Our office can be reached You can calendar a case assessment by texting us at 833-691-7255 or calling us at 303-688-0944.