R&H Logo
I understand Colorado to be a fence out state. But I'm wondering if a certain gentleman is allowed to run his cows on mine and all of my 16 different neighbor's land. We basically have sixteen 40 acre lots all owned by various different individuals. All 16 of the lots are fenced in has one big chunk. A few of the landowners have fences around their individual 40 acre lots. Is it legal for a certain gentleman to run his cows on our land? He also does not have water rights and is letting his cows drink from an irrigation ditch to the north that he does not own.
Nov 4, 2024
Real Estate
Close Menu IconThe information provided is for general information and does not form an attorney-client relationship. See our .
Bill HenryFounding Partner | 18 years of experience
Profile Picture of Attorney Bill Henry
Profile Picture of Attorney Bill Henry
Bill HenryFounding Partner 18 years of experience

In Colorado, which operates as an open range or “fence-out” state, livestock owners generally have the right to let their animals roam, meaning landowners must fence animals out if they don’t want them entering their property. However, while this rule supports livestock owners’ rights, it doesn’t provide a blanket license for a person to intentionally run cattle on others’ fenced or enclosed property.

From what you’ve described, it sounds like there is a large, jointly-fenced area that incorporates multiple 40-acre lots, with some individual owners fencing their parcels within the larger fenced area. The question of legality depends on a few key issues:

1. Right to Graze: Simply put, the gentleman does not have an inherent right to graze his cattle on land he does not own. Without an easement, grazing lease, or some form of agreement (known as a license) with the landowners, he cannot legally use the property for grazing. The principle of open range law doesn’t override the need for consent to use someone else’s fenced or enclosed property. Therefore, if the cattle are being purposefully directed onto your jointly fenced land, he could be overstepping his rights.

2. Fencing Requirements and Liability for Damages: Under Colorado’s fence-out law, if you want to prevent cattle from entering, you would generally need to construct a sufficient fence. However, if the cattle cause harm to your land—such as trampling crops or damaging property—the owner could still be held liable for damages. Colorado law doesn’t typically include minor nuisances like grazing on native grasses or minor waste left behind, but it could cover damage to developed or cultivated areas.

3. Water Rights and Access: Water rights in Colorado are legally complex and are typically allocated separately from the land itself. If the irrigation ditch is on another party’s property and the gentleman does not have water rights, allowing his cattle to drink from it may constitute a violation. The owner of the ditch or the water rights holder could have grounds to address this unauthorized use, as water rights are strictly managed and enforced in Colorado.

To sum up, while Colorado is a fence-out state, this gentleman doesn’t have the right to intentionally graze his cattle on private, enclosed land without permission. Addressing this could involve clarifying each landowner’s intentions regarding shared fences and confirming the legal water rights for the irrigation ditch. I would suggest speaking with an attorney. If you would like a case assessment please call us at (303) 688-0944 and ask for a consultation with attorney Steve Whitmore, who has experience in these matters.

Disclaimer
The response provided is based on the available information and is not intended to constitute a comprehensive answer to the inquiry. The only manner to obtain complete and adequate legal advice is to consult with an attorney. Please be advised that no communication, including Q&A postings, through this website establishes an attorney-client privilege, and such exchanges do not create an attorney-client relationship and will not be treated as confidential. The information presented is general information only and should not be relied upon to take, or fail to take, legal action.
Didn’t find what you were looking for?